When it comes to technology, sixty-one years is a long time and there is no doubt the state of technology from when KEF first started designing cutting-edge products to today has come a long way. But compared to the history of how music has been shaped by – and shaped – culture, it’s a mere blink of an eye: The relationship between technology and music goes back to the dawn of time. Since our humble beginnings in a Quonset hut in Maidstone, England all those years ago, we’ve been lucky to be a part of the most exciting and explosive growth in all of history. To help celebrate our birthday, here’s a brief look at the relationship between technology and music over the past 37,000 years or so, give or take a decade or two.
At its essence, music is a means of communication. We’re lucky to live in a time when music is easily accessible and exists for our entertainment, but that wasn’t always the case. If you’re forty years old, your grandparents might have had access to a radio when they were kids. Your great-grandparents grew up without recorded music – every musical experience they had as kids was immediate and ethereal. Music simply ceased to exist after it was performed, except in memory or on some arcane notation on a piece of paper.
Music was a means of conveying information and most importantly to record history. Today we use music for a variety of mostly personal reasons, and we tend to listen accordingly, but the use of music for strictly personal reasons is a modern development. Throughout history music was a communal experience; it wasn’t until recording and playback technology became widely available that we entered a period of personal or small social group listening. Obviously, festivals and concerts are still communal events, but they’re not the primary way we listen to music today. Seventy years ago, we consumed most of our music via live performances and a very small percentage through recorded means, but technology has completely reversed that. At once music has become more personal while technology has largely disconnected us from the performer and performance – and other people.
At the start of the 20th Century, blues and country music was written for an immediate audience – typically a gathering on a front porch or church social – and stringed instruments were loud enough to convey the song to the intended audience. The subject matter was an extension of the storytelling and history-keeping that had always been music’s primary function. A sharecropper in Mississippi had a story to tell that was his and his alone, yet it was the exact same story a listener in Chicago could relate to – this was, and always has been, the connection we have to music and musicians.
During this time, particularly in the West, church music began to take advantage of the massive cathedrals being built and new technology like the pipe organ. The argument could also be made that the massive churches and cathedrals in Europe were built as an expression of musical technology rather than a result of it. Exploiting the cathedral’s reverberation times, music became a supernal experience meant for the masses. Melodies were simple and repetitive, enhancing the meditative experience. A similar effect is obtained by the Islamic adhan recited from a mosque’s minaret by the mu’azzin – a musical call to the spiritual that goes directly to the soul of the listener.
Music is imprinted in our souls and cultures because of the messages it conveys – happiness, sadness, loss, regret, hope for the future, and a simple telling of stories we relate to as our own. It’s interesting to look at any genre of music and see how it was written, produced and performed for the intended audience and medium. It’s also interesting to look at how technology and progress has constantly changed our relationship with music.
Music is a reflection of the times, and the times are a reflection of what the music is capable of doing – a truly symbiotic relationship if there ever was one.